Volume 64, Issue 3

SYMPOSIUM: GETTING READY FOR INDIVIDUALLY MANAGED PENSIONS: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

WHY PENSION REFORM?

The United States: How to Deal with 
Uncovered Future Social Security Liabilities 
Edward M. Gramlich

Evaluating the Case for Social Security Reform: 
Elderly Poverty, Paternalism and Private Pensions
Maria O'Brien Hylton

Commentary 
Morton Klevan

PENSION REFORM AROUND THE WORLD

Comparative Features and Performance of Structural
Pension Reforms in Latin America
Carmelo Mesa-Lago

Pensions and Post-Retirement 
Benefits by Employers in Germany 
Lothar Schruff  

Commentary 
Friedrich Kübler

Privatization of Public Pension Systems in Developing
Nations: A Call for International Standards
Joseph J. Norton

Commentary 
Ruth Goldman

United Kingdom Pensions Law Reform
George Walker

THE PRIVATIZATION PROCESS

Pensions Mis-Selling The Lessons for Regulating
Privatised Social Security
Richard Nobles & Julia Black

Supplementary Pensions in the Single Market:
The Commission View Paolo 
Clarotti  

Redistribution Under a Partially Privatized Social
Security System 
Kathryn L. Moore

PENSION BENEFIT AND LEGAL INVESTMENT LAWS

The Regulation of Funded Social Security
Deborah M. Weiss

The Profile: Designer Disclosure for Mutual Funds
Bevis Longstreth

Commentary 
Jeffrey N. Gordon

REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL MANAGEMENT OF PENSION FUNDS

The Challenge to Financial Regulators Posed 
by Social Security Privatization 
Roberta S. Karmel

Comparative Investor Education 
James A. Fanto

Commentary 
Gregory S. Alexander

Commentary 
Margaret A. Bancroft

NOTE

Who Should Have it Both Ways?: 
The Role of Mitigating Measures in an ADA Analysis

COMMENT

Chandler v. Miller: Drug Testing Candidates for 
State Office Under the "Special Needs" Exception

Brooklyn Law Review
250 Joralemon Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201
Phone: (718) 780-7968/9   Fax: (718) 780-0353
E-mail: lreview@brooklaw.edu