CRAWFORD AND BEYOND: REVISITED IN DIALOGUE
Introduction by Robert M. Pitler

NOT “THE FRAMERS’ DESIGN”: HOW THE FRAMING-ERA BAN AGAINST HEARSAY EVIDENCE REFUTES THE CRAWFORD-DAVIS “TESTIMONIAL” FORMULATION OF THE SCOPE OF THE ORIGINAL CONFRONTATION CLAUSE
Thomas Y. Davies

THE (FUTILE) SEARCH FOR A COMMON LAW RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION: BEYOND BRASIER’S IRRELEVANCE TO (PERHAPS) RELEVANT AMERICAN CASES
Randolph N. Jonakait

THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE AND ORIGINALISM:
LESSONS FROM KING V. BRASIER
Anthony J. Franze

CRAWFORD, DAVIS, AND WAY BEYOND
Richard D. Friedman

WHAT HAPPENED-AND WHAT IS HAPPENING-TO THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE?
Jeffrey L. Fisher

CONFRONTATION RULES AFTER DAVIS V. WASHINGTON
Roger W. Kirst

CONFRONTATION AS CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: CRAWFORD'S BIRTH DID NOT REQUIRE THAT ROBERTS HAD TO DIE
Robert P. Mosteller

A RELATIONAL APPROACH TO RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION AND ITS LOSS
Deborah Tuerkheimer

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES AFTER DAVIS: THE GLASS HALF EMPTY OR HALF FULL?
Myrna S. Raeder

EXPERT EVIDENCE AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE AFTER CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON
Jennifer L. Mnookin

FORESHADOWING THE FUTURE OF FORFEITURE/ESTOPPEL BY WRONGDOING: DAVIS V. WASHINGTON AND THE NECESSITY OF THE DEFENDANT'S INTENT TO INTIMIDATE THE WITNESS
James F. Flanagan