|
SCIENCE FOR JUDGES VII:
EVALUATING EVIDENCE OF CAUSATION & FORENSIC LABORATORIES: CURRENT ISSUES & STANDARDS
Introduction by Margaret A. Berger
A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS:
GAPS, RELEVANCE AND INTEGRATED EVIDENCE
Carl F. Cranor, Ph.D., M.S.L.
REGULATING CRIME LABORATORIES: THE IMPACT OF DNA EVIDENCE
Paul C. Giannelli, J.D., M.S.
JUDGMENT FOR JUDGES: WHAT TRADITIONAL STATISTICS DON’T TELL YOU ABOUT CAUSAL CLAIMS
Steven N. Goodman, M.D.
DETERMINING DISEASE CAUSALITY FROM EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES
Ronald L. Melnick, Ph.D. & John R. Bucher, Ph.D.
THE NATURE AND NECESSITY OF SCIENTIFIC JUDGMENT
Douglas L. Weed, M.D., Ph.D.
Notes and Comments
ONLINE AUCTION HOUSES: HOW TRADEMARK OWNERS PROTECT BRAND INTEGRITY AGAINST COUNTERFEITING
Emily Favre
FEARING FEAR ITSELF: THE PROPOSED GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2005 AND PUBLIC FEARS ABOUT GENETIC INFORMATION
Rivka Jungreis
NOT TOO LITTLE, BUT A LITTLE TOO LATE:
THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S REFUSAL TO CONSIDER NEW ISSUES RAISED BY SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
Christopher R. Prior
PROTECTIONISM, PUNISHMENT AND PARIAHS:
SEX OFFENDERS AND RESIDENCE RESTRICTIONS
Meghan S. Towers
|