Articles:
Confrontation and Hearsay Issues in Federal Court Terrorism Prosecutions of Gitmo Detainees: Moussaoui and Paracha as Harbingers?
Norman Abrams
Scientific Evidence as Foreign Law
Edward K. Cheng
Evidentiary Incommensurability: A Preliminary Exploration of the Problem of Reasoning from General Scientific Data to Individualized Legal Decision-Making
David L. Faigman
Scientific Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions: A Retrospective
Paul C. Giannelli
Professor Margaret Berger, the Epitome of the Fully Engaged Scholar and Friend of the Court
Edward J. Imwinkelried
Individualization Claims in Forensic Science: Still Unwarranted
Konathan J. Koehler & Michael J. Saks
The Courts, the NAS, and the Future of Forensic Science
Jennifer L. Mnookin
Revealing and Thereby Tempering the Abuses of Government-Created Evidence in Criminal Trials
Robert P. Mosteller
Honoring Margaret Berger with a Sensible Idea: Insisting that Judges Employ a Balancing Test Before Admitting the Accused’s Convictions Under Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a)(2)
Aviva Orenstein
Reflections on Teaching Evidence with an Audience Response System
Roger C. Park
Thoughts About Giles and Forfeiture in Domestic Violence Cases
Myrna S. Raeder
Inquiry, Relevance, Rules of Exclusion, and Evidentiary Reform
D. Michael Risinger
Applying Daubert Inconsistently?: Proof of Individual Causation in Toxic Tort and Forensic Cases
Joseph Sanders